The European Union’s Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 establishes a comprehensive framework for the clinical evaluation of medical devices, ensuring their safety and performance before market introduction. Central to this framework is the categorization of clinical investigations, each serving distinct purposes in the device development lifecycle. The primary types of clinical investigations include Exploratory, Observational, Confirmatory, and Interventional studies.
- Exploratory Clinical Investigations
Definition: Exploratory investigations are preliminary studies conducted to gather initial data on a medical device’s safety, performance, and design feasibility. These studies are typically undertaken in the early stages of device development and involve a limited number of subjects.
Purpose: The primary aim is to identify potential issues related to the device’s design and functionality, providing insights that inform subsequent development phases.
Application: Used during the initial phases of device development to assess basic safety and performance, guiding necessary modifications.
Example: A first-in-human study assessing the usability and basic safety of a novel minimally invasive surgical instrument intended for laparoscopic procedures.
A study examining the effect of a new implant on bone healing.
Selection Criteria: Chosen when there is limited human data available, and initial insights are needed to inform subsequent development stages.
- Observational Clinical Investigations
Definition: Observational studies involve monitoring and collecting data on a medical device’s performance and safety without any intervention from the investigators. Subjects receive the standard care, and the device is used according to its intended purpose.
Purpose: These investigations aim to gather real-world data on device performance, identify rare or long-term adverse events, and assess effectiveness in a broader patient population.
Application: Suitable for post-market surveillance to monitor the device’s performance across diverse patient populations.
Example: A registry study tracking the long-term outcomes of patients implanted with a specific type of cardiac pacemaker, collecting data on device longevity, complication rates, and patient quality of life.
A study investigating the long-term effects of an already marketed device on patient satisfaction
Selection Criteria: Appropriate when the goal is to understand how the device performs in everyday clinical settings without experimental manipulation.
- Confirmatory Clinical Investigations
Definition: Confirmatory studies are rigorous investigations designed to provide definitive evidence of a medical device’s safety and effectiveness. These studies often involve larger sample sizes and are statistically powered to confirm hypotheses generated from earlier studies.
Purpose: The goal is to substantiate the device’s clinical benefits and support regulatory submissions for market approval.
Application: Conducted after exploratory studies have indicated potential benefits, to validate findings in a larger, more diverse population.
Example: A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a new drug-eluting stent to a standard bare-metal stent in reducing restenosis rates in patients with coronary artery disease.
A randomized controlled trial showing that a new device yields better results compared to the standard treatment.
Selection Criteria: Implemented when substantial preliminary data suggests the device is safe and potentially effective, necessitating confirmation in a larger cohort.
- Interventional Clinical Investigations
Definition: Interventional studies involve actively introducing a medical device into a subject’s care to evaluate its effects. These investigations are characterized by the deliberate application of the device and the assessment of its impact on clinical outcomes.
Purpose: To determine the device’s therapeutic or diagnostic effectiveness and monitor any associated risks under controlled conditions.
Application: Used to evaluate new devices or new applications of existing devices under controlled conditions.
Example: A clinical trial assessing the therapeutic efficacy of a new insulin pump system in managing blood glucose levels in patients with type 1 diabetes, where participants are assigned to use the new device and their outcomes are compared to those using standard insulin therapy.
A study showing that a new surgical technique leads to fewer complications compared to the traditional method.
Selection Criteria: Selected when the research question requires direct assessment of the device’s impact on health outcomes, and randomization is feasible and ethical.
- Retrospective Studies
Definition: Studies that analyze existing data collected from past records to assess the performance or safety of a medical device.
Purpose: To identify trends, outcomes, or potential issues related to the device’s use by examining historical data.
Application: Useful for post-market surveillance or when prospective data collection is impractical.
Example: A study reviewing medical records to evaluate the long-term durability of a particular model of heart valve prosthesis implanted over the past decade.
Selection Criteria: Appropriate when existing data is sufficient to address the research question, especially for rare outcomes or long-term effects.
Each of these clinical investigation types plays a vital role in the comprehensive evaluation of medical devices under the EU MDR framework. By systematically progressing through these stages, manufacturers can ensure that their devices meet the stringent safety and performance standards required for market approval, ultimately safeguarding patient health and well-being.
- Clinical Investigations Under Annex XVI
Annex XVI of the MDR outlines specific provisions for the clinical evaluation of non-medical purpose products. These products are typically used for aesthetic or cosmetic purposes and don’t provide a medical benefit. However, clinical investigations may still be necessary to ensure the safety of these products.
Clinical investigations under Annex XVI are generally conducted for the following purposes:
- To evaluate the product’s suitability and safety for its intended purpose.
- To determine the product’s performance and effectiveness.
- To identify potential side effects and risks associated with the product.
These types of clinical investigations can also fall under the basic types mentioned earlier (exploratory, observational, confirmatory, interventional). However, their objectives and focus differ from clinical investigations for medical devices.
Example: A clinical investigation examining the wrinkle-reducing effect of a cosmetic product falls under Annex XVI. This study will be conducted to evaluate the product’s effectiveness and safety. The study can be observational or interventional in nature.
Clinical investigations under Annex XVI must also comply with the ethical principles and standards outlined in the MDR. The results of these investigations can be used as evidence to demonstrate the product’s safety and performance.
- Importance of Clinical Investigations
Clinical investigations are vital to ensure the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. Through these studies:
- Patient safety is ensured.
- Information is obtained about the performance and benefits of medical devices.
- New treatment methods are developed.
- The quality of healthcare services is improved.
The MDR requires that clinical investigations are conducted in accordance with ethical principles and that patient rights are protected. For this reason, all clinical investigations must be approved by the competent authorities and strictly monitored.
Our team of medical device compliance experts is here to help! We specialize in clinical investigations, MDR compliance, and quality management systems.
📩 Contact us to ensure your medical device meets regulatory requirements!